In this Discussion
- Amyquil December 2017
- carey January 2018
- DamienWyer December 2017
- Fastmoney December 2017
- H-BOMBER December 2017
- loose_goose December 2017
- Nevershowsurprise December 2017
- paraletic January 2018
- RIO January 2018
- Rodent January 2018
- spinking December 2017
- The_Husson December 2017
- thefalcon January 2018
- therealkramer December 2017
Who's Online
0 Members & 34 Non Members
Comments
Maybe RWWA should put more effort into getting things right rather than silencing critics. Has anyone at RWWA adressed this or other handicapping issues publicly?
Funny that Wes Cameron regularly puts Steve Wolfe to air knowing that he can't help himself and that he will tee off about something, yet a low profile industry participant cops these standover tactics. The stupid part is that Rio wasn't leading or driving this debate: it was a pair of eastern stater's who seemingly have no connection to this industry.
Surely those two guys are only the ones worth silencing here; and good luck with that!
I guess there is Matt Rigby: the pressure could go on there. In fact, I'm sure the contact has already been made
carey, RIO likes this post.
spinking likes this post.
you started here with an idiotic comment, that was nothing to do with the subject at hand and have been backtracking ever since.
rereading your last sentence indicates just how stupid you are.
that their handicapping is so bad, would enhance MY stuff because it is easy to pick where they stuffed up.
god, think about it.
i have been ranting for the last week that they have stuffed it up!
so just how the fug is it going to ruin anything of mine???????????
Just GO.......pleeeaaaasssssse
therealkramer likes this post.
I know you're keenly awaiting updates to the great race. Be patient it will be worth the wait.
Ok. I'll go but before i do here's another one from the boss, as a tribute to your outdated systems that cant win here or in hk
but i reckon without rodent and the like(i'm done) there is no industry.
so i reckon that's a big connection that most people take for granted.
Can i interest you in a comma?
spinking likes this post.
try frankie if you want him at his best!
even allowing for the fact that i am not as good at it, as i once was, i am 100% sure i could still smack your **** at the game.
Desperado, rooboy, Amyquil, SKIDS likes this post.
Serious question: Did your computer bet on every race or was it selective?
simply a data repository.
but that was then, and i am smart enough to know that those ways don't work any more, because your opponents do use computers.
and the people that win all the money these days don't necessarily know diddly squat about racing.
for the main part they are academics that know statistics and math.
for me i have never claimed to win money using computers, that's your assumption
it's just something that i do these days trying to emulate what the teams do, but it will NEVER be as good as them, because it is me alone, and I don't spend millions trying to make zillions!
and i lack their skill at math and statistics.
i do know that those that do use the computers tend to bet every race, every pool, everywhere(that has pari - mutuel), where they perceive expectation is exceeded.
when it was me and the people with me, it was much more selective.
i have been involved with both.
my old ways are the way of the dodo.
let's put it this way how do you think you can make zillions being selective?
that way would mean you have to bet big, and it's not so easy getting set these days, as it once was for the amounts needed.
betting on everything means your bets can be much smaller and your cents in the dollar profit would be much smaller too, but you win much much much more money for far less risk.
and your paying for it.
therealkramer likes this post.
i have written lot of programs that can bet automatically, so it's conceivable i could be asleep when bets were being made.
it's no big deal, there are probably people reading this, that do that exact thing.
My guess is you and Rodent are safe to say what you like as long you don't defame anyone.
but people should be free to say what they like, provided it's true, and whether they are licensed or not
if it's not true, then they should not be saying it, licensed or not.
i am confident of what i say, as far as it being true is concerned, or i wouldn't say it.
The_Husson likes this post.
First rule of defamation to those thinking that they have been wronged, really should be, is there any risk in trying to crush this guy by us acting like we are a Goliath and he just a pawn ?
Second suggested rule should be, does he have an almost unlimited legal resource at his disposal with some of the best legal minds in town lining up to advise, assist and represent him in this matter ?
But on a more serious note, because my matter was always going to be buried, just be careful on here what you say in print. I can't say if RWWA are litigious by nature but the same can't be said for other racing organisations. RWWA of course do have other tools at their disposal being the controlling body for licensed persons in the WA Racing Industry, so to transgress their rules you do at your own peril.
Righto, back to not giving a rat's **** about Racing here anymore.
Couldn't agree more
The_Husson likes this post.
While I agree, one of the rules regarding the social media rules is image related. If it appears to be detrimental to the image of racing you are in breach. Unfortunately it doesn't regard the truth on this occasion but only in another rule.
Edit:adding on to the last as I just checked it but also one part stipulates being hateful to RWWA (you may not be) but I guess they can interpret it that way
maybe they will win 10 races in Gero. Was just trying to be posative. The amount of races i have lost from too much weight, bad luck, bad ride could fill a book. Every owner is the same. Best not to dwell on it.
The_Husson likes this post.
you can have horses weighted badly but fairly.
this WAS NOT the case, it was wrong and unfair.
the rest of your reasons are irrelevant