In this Discussion
- detonator February 2019
- H-BOMBER February 2019
- hash February 2019
- Jell February 2019
- loose_goose February 2019
- Ridersonthestorm33 February 2019
- SLIPPERGOLDEN February 2019
Who's Online
0 Members & 19 Non Members
Narrogin 17-2-19
West Australian Racing
Rodent
7,038 posts
Jim Taylor too good. The shorty flops and they win with the stablemate at big odds.
+1 -1
Ridersonthestorm33 likes this post.
Comments
Ridersonthestorm33 likes this post.
Back to Jim Taylor - very few have a rule of thumb with but he's a trainer you practically need to always include. When takes them to Narrogin its their last hurrah.
The stablemate situation - it's an old one - but it's a good one.
Doesn't always work out of course, but staying with the system and going the top weight Brothers Keeper. Small the win ($2) and huge the place ($10) b-(
Non competitive tote ( it's gone downhill - even Tabcorp admit that ) and corporates ( look at Racing.Com when they have the market % down the bottom of screen ) that when on their way to the barrier are still set at 120-130%.
The examples with Yogi and Venguer Masque - both were around $8 - $10 - and exactly what your saying is correct - they were good chances at the weights despite carrying number one saddlecloths considering the quality of horses they've competed against.
Anybody who has punted awhile and say over 45 years of age must see that in comparison to "yesterday" horses like Yogi and Venguer Masque are thrown in at the weights - when running in those types of events.
There was a horse just recently in Adelaide running at Gawler - Olympic Academy carried 64kgs - it's run against quality Sydney stayers - bolted in.
Good honest run Brothers Keeper - thought had the chocolates - beaten by the lightweight haha.
Conversely in a Melbourne Cup - heard quite a few say Venguer Masque great lightweight chance but in my opinion no he isn't - he's poorly in.
As a I say it's nowhere near a foolproof system. Will have to keep stats, but it happens often. Esperance Cup a small example - saddle cloth winning numbers were 1,2,3.
Today Brothers Keeper and Witness In Court top two numbers - 2nd and 3rd. Just very small exampes.
The whole theory though just rests on one thing - the top weighted horses in these type of races - but only in comparison to the 1970s through to the 1990s - are in so much better and conversely bottom weighted ones not so good.
There was a Melbourne Cup whereby think ( before my time ) Rising Fast carried 63kgs and was beaten a nose by Toparoa carrying 44kgs!
Will have to check the exact of what they carried but it was something like that.
Today Rising Fast would have 58kgs or 59 max and Toparoa into the 50s - when considering only a nose between them... Rising Fast would beat Toparoa by 10 lengths - yet you'd still hear some go - yep good lightweight chance Toparoa.
Only call it as I see it though.
Even in the 1400 metre plus races - can only just remember and been told about him - but there was a horse called Detonator he would be carrying 64-65kgs and winning whilst the bottom weights carried 46 and 48kgs.
Overall today think top weighted horses are in much better at the weights from Narrogin Cups to Group One handicaps. Doesn't mean their going to win though.
However how would a Detonator go today with a much more compressed weight scale ? He'd be invincible.
Desperado, squid69, Ridersonthestorm33, jum likes this post.
I would have to change my name to Winx ;)
Ridersonthestorm33 likes this post.
Didn't back - still didn't think could win haha - but made me sit up and realise - if you can get a top weight into form there in very well at the weights. ( Compared to the past ).
No better example than Star Exhibit - past Perth Cup winner - A Group One Doomben Cup place getter - he was fair dinkum thrown in - look at how little weight a horse like Brothers Keeper received from him.
The secret is to have them right on the day and Star Exhibit was as was Sydney Cup top weight Who Shot The Barman he was rough too - for some reason they often are.
thefalcon likes this post.