G'day Punter!

Sign In Register

In this Discussion

Who's Online

0 Members & 45 Non Members

AFL Round 4

Sport

Comments

  • Unknown
    Dont need Impaja - Foxtel replay them all and if you have IQ can record and watch at your leisure

    was only 7 games this weekend - watched 3 live - the others on replay and yes I had a very quiet weekend - normally would watch one or two games Monday and possibly another Tuesday
    +1 -1
  • octaviusoctavius    2,290 posts
    said:

    Dont need Impaja - Foxtel replay them all and if you have IQ can record and watch at your leisure

    was only 7 games this weekend - watched 3 live - the others on replay and yes I had a very quiet weekend - normally would watch one or two games Monday and possibly another Tuesday

    Was wondering why I didn't get 8 tips this weekend...

    So much footy yet no idea...

    <add embarrassed emoticon here> and <here> and one more right <here>
    +1 -1
  • TiversTivers    7,720 posts
    said:

    said:

    Carlton v essendon was a cracker game

    haha, most draws are, I suppose you will have us believe you watched it on IMPIANA or whatever that station is called?

    So you watched nearly 24 hours of football over the weekend? you need to get a life if that is true.
    I watched it live, on OneHD
    In Sydney - where you get better coverage than in the football state of WA !!! :x
    +1 -1
  • TheFunksterTheFunkster    3,840 posts
    said:

    lol - love how you give Fyfe 3 votes

    Pav was clearly the best this time around

    Fyfe maybe a 2 or 1 tho - played a ripper game

    32 posessions and 2 goals v 34 posessions and 0 goals AND was wearing strapping around his head - which will get the umps attention :P
    Was lucky that Ballantyne missed a few goals.
    Still paying $126 to win and may have about 7 votes already
    +1 -1
  • TiversTivers    7,720 posts
    How muh you want on ?
    I'll hold it
    +1 -1
  • DecDec    147 posts
    http://www.afl.com.au/news/newsarticle/tabid/208/newsid/111894/default.aspx

    I reckon everyone on here would agree? :wink:

    The article says Priddis was ordinary in 2010, pretty harsh marking for a bloke who had just about zero support in terms of contested possessions - had someone hanging off him just about every week.
    +1 -1
  • TheFunksterTheFunkster    3,840 posts
    said:

    How muh you want on ?
    I'll hold it

    Already on at $501 and $126 a place
    +1 -1
  • darkshinesdarkshines    2,837 posts
    I'd rather have the $26 I took on Jobe Watson
    +1 -1
  • Unknown
    Think its a disgrace that betting agency have Pavlich listed in the betting when he is facing a striking charge
    +1 -1
  • dungydungy    9,278 posts
    He [pav] has been given a reprimand so no probs at all if he accepts in which he will
    +1 -1
  • dungydungy    9,278 posts
    said:

    said:

    said:

    said:

    said:

    We should have another rising star this week...

    WA had one last week - shame its gonna be a Vict this week
    I hope your not talking about Pitt?
    no I was talking about Jasper Pittard - unlike some people I actually watch all the games and make an unbiased opinion on things
    I reckon I know a fair bit more about JMP than you, didn't see the game, but statistically Darling had a better game and was playing a HF role which is much tougher than a running back receiver role.

    Darling has had a much better month of football which is always taken into account in this process and the only thing I can see going for Pittard is that Port won and we didn't which may carry some weight.

    See all the games on the weekend did you? I doubt it. Hope you caught the SUNS replay, they are improving...not.
    Why would you no more about JMP are you in the inner circle or just like to think you are or just read a lot of websites
    +1 -1
  • Unknown
    said:

    He [pav] has been given a reprimand so no probs at all if he accepts in which he will

    he has been charged with striking level 2 - if he accepts it with an early plea it goes to reprimand but still cant win the brownlow
    +1 -1
  • octaviusoctavius    2,290 posts
    said:

    Why would you no more about JMP are you in the inner circle or just like to think you are or just read a lot of websites

    I had an affair with his sisters friends boyfriends aunties brother in law.
    +1 -1
  • dungydungy    9,278 posts
    said:

    said:

    He [pav] has been given a reprimand so no probs at all if he accepts in which he will

    he has been charged with striking level 2 - if he accepts it with an early plea it goes to reprimand but still cant win the brownlow
    Fair call
    +1 -1
  • Unknown
    said:

    said:

    He [pav] has been given a reprimand so no probs at all if he accepts in which he will

    he has been charged with striking level 2 - if he accepts it with an early plea it goes to reprimand but still cant win the brownlow
    He is challenging it - looks like you got it wrong twice dungy :P

    fingers crossed they are successful - need Pav this week
    +1 -1
  • rellecherelleche    99 posts
    said:

    said:

    said:

    said:

    We should have another rising star this week...

    WA had one last week - shame its gonna be a Vict this week
    I hope your not talking about Pitt?
    no I was talking about Jasper Pittard, more importantly he contributed to a winning team and his opponent only had 12 touches - unlike some people I actually watch all the games and make an unbiased opinion on things

    PS - wont surprise me if Darling gets in but I thought Pittard was better, the guy playing on Darling had 30 possessions

    Good call Della
    +1 -1
  • TheFunksterTheFunkster    3,840 posts
    edited April 2011
    said:

    said:

    said:

    He [pav] has been given a reprimand so no probs at all if he accepts in which he will

    he has been charged with striking level 2 - if he accepts it with an early plea it goes to reprimand but still cant win the brownlow
    He is challenging it - looks like you got it wrong twice dungy :P

    fingers crossed they are successful - need Pav this week
    I thought he can contest and still not miss, as loses the 25% discount for an early guilty plea but still keeps the 25% discount for his good record over last 5 years?

    He has an existing five-year good record, which reduces the sanction by 25 per cent to a reprimand and 93.75 points towards his future record. An early plea reduces the sanction by 25 per cent to a reprimand and 70.31 points towards his future record.

    Daws should get off. That was just clumsy, not reckless or careless and also pretty soft contact.
    Pav imo will be lucky to get off on that one. Should've just taken the early plea
    +1 -1
  • Unknown
    it did surprise me when I heard they were challenging it - makes sense now

    thats Funkster
    +1 -1
  • octaviusoctavius    2,290 posts
    said:

    said:

    said:

    said:

    said:

    We should have another rising star this week...

    WA had one last week - shame its gonna be a Vict this week
    I hope your not talking about Pitt?
    no I was talking about Jasper Pittard, more importantly he contributed to a winning team and his opponent only had 12 touches - unlike some people I actually watch all the games and make an unbiased opinion on things

    PS - wont surprise me if Darling gets in but I thought Pittard was better, the guy playing on Darling had 30 possessions

    Good call Della
    So you went onto Fan Footy and read the icon besides the players names?

    What you failed to mention was that Jaensch was only Pittards opponent for about 2 1/2 qtrs before moving down back, you also 'forgot' to mention he kicked a goal.

    So those stats you provided us were not indicative of the truth, and I think everyone knows that raw stats are often misleading. Also, anybody who has actually played the game knows how much harder it is playing as a forward than a back, especially in the era of zones.
    +1 -1
  • Unknown
    lol - even when you are wrong - you still think you are right :P

    PS - Birchall kicked a goal too and he was playing in the backline
    +1 -1
  • octaviusoctavius    2,290 posts
    said:

    lol - even when you are wrong - you still think you are right :P

    PS - Birchall kicked a goal too

    Nope, good on Pittard, as I said I didn't see the game so obviously he did deserve it, but I did see Darling and he was very impressive, and has been all year, especially when he ran down Pittard in Rd 2 and drove him into the ground.

    But if you are going to argue a point, don't manipulate the facts because I find it hard to believe your omissions were simply an oversight.

    When I said that Darling had a better game statistically speaking that was because he had a higher SC score which is based on champion data and takes into account impact on a game, and again that is not a true reflection, but would be the best pointer available.

    It is also fair to say that there have been some strange nominations in the past for various reasons, not saying this is one of them, but there are a number of things that are obviously taken into account, many of which the public is unaware of and are not a direct reflection of the performance in which the player receives said nomination.
    +1 -1
  • Unknown
    manipulate the facts - lol

    you want me to detail everything within the entire game? - was just an overview on how I saw things

    I am not gonna argue SC points and the like but it makes no account for what the opposition player did during the game

    Was just my opinion that Pittard would get the Rising Star and amazingly I got one right - cmon gimme some credit :P

    PS - I really like Darling and have him in my Dream Team so hope he gets the nomination that he will without a doubt deserve soon
    +1 -1
  • rellecherelleche    99 posts
    said:

    lol - even when you are wrong - you still think you are right :P

    PS - Birchall kicked a goal too and he was playing in the backline



    He's like a dog with a bone :lol:
    +1 -1
  • octaviusoctavius    2,290 posts
    said:

    manipulate the facts - lol

    you want me to detail everything within the entire game? - was just an overview on how I saw things

    So are you saying you didn't goto FF and grab those stats?

    Seriously?
    +1 -1
  • rellecherelleche    99 posts
    said:

    said:

    manipulate the facts - lol

    you want me to detail everything within the entire game? - was just an overview on how I saw things

    So are you saying you didn't goto FF and grab those stats?

    Seriously?
    Woof
    +1 -1
  • TheFunksterTheFunkster    3,840 posts
    said:

    He's like a dog with a bone :lol:

    Or a head with a knob.....and only one eye! :roll:
    +1 -1
  • octaviusoctavius    2,290 posts
    said:

    said:

    He's like a dog with a bone :lol:

    Or a head with a knob.....and only one eye! :roll:
    Awww, all these compliments, and from Freo supporters too, I am truly overwhelmed, keep them coming...
    +1 -1
  • TiversTivers    7,720 posts
    Even better - someone lock this thread.
    BORING..................
    +1 -1
  • dungydungy    9,278 posts
    said:

    said:

    said:

    He [pav] has been given a reprimand so no probs at all if he accepts in which he will

    he has been charged with striking level 2 - if he accepts it with an early plea it goes to reprimand but still cant win the brownlow
    He is challenging it - looks like you got it wrong twice dungy :P

    fingers crossed they are successful - need Pav this week
    Might have got it wrong twice Della agreed even the greats like you get things wrong dont you
    +1 -1
  • Unknown
    If i had a dollar for everytime I got somethign wrong I would be a millionaire

    not afraid to admit my mistakes
    +1 -1
Sign In or Register to comment.