In this Discussion
- [DeletedUser] November 2012
- Amission December 2012
- Aquanita November 2012
- BobbyDavis December 2012
- Brunswick_cow November 2012
- clevermother November 2012
- DamienWyer November 2012
- darkshines November 2012
- dungy December 2012
- everready November 2012
- helmet November 2012
- Jordan November 2012
- loose_goose November 2012
- PieMan November 2012
- Piston_Broke December 2012
- Radman November 2012
- rick November 2012
- RIO December 2012
- Rodent November 2012
- rot8in November 2012
- scenic11 November 2012
- Shergar November 2012
- SLIPPERGOLDEN December 2012
- SuperSnoop December 2012
- TheDiva December 2012
- thefalcon December 2012
- TorpedoPunt November 2012
- TSS December 2012
- Voodoo November 2012
Who's Online
0 Members & 326 Non Members
Comments
He is still young, so he still has time to learn from this.
if the comment that he is good mates with "that footballer" is a recipe for disaster.
:-B Clevermother being clever , i thought i'd just read something similar a page ago! <):)
I think that is 5 identities now ?
to turn up 5+days a week some 5-10 kg under there natural weight get it right day in day out "can ya be 3 back the fence from 19 @the gate" ect .thou i hate wat drugs do to society these people r under plenty pressure day in day out and if they
hav a weakness it is sometimes comes to the fore when things get tuff! i think education/counserling is the best we can do.
good luck clint hope to see u back happy healthier & wiser
MEDIA RELEASE
Thoroughbred – Jockey Clint Harvey
RWWA Stewards today commenced an inquiry into the report received from the ChemCentre (Perth) in regard to the presence of a banned substance in the urine sample taken from Jockey Clint Harvey at the Lark Hill Barrier Trials on Monday, 5 November 2012.
This finding had been verified by Racing Analytical Services Limited (Victoria).
Evidence was taken from RWWA Principal Investigator, Mr. P O’Reilly, Mr. James White, Acting Science Business Manager (ChemCentre) and Jockey Mr Clint Harvey.
The Stewards subsequently adjourned the inquiry to a date and time to be fixed to enable Mr C. Harvey to consider the evidence heard and consult with his legal advisors who had forwarded a written submission to the inquiry.
Jockey Harvey remains stood down pursuant to AR81A(3) from riding trackwork, trials and races until the conclusion of the Stewards’ Inquiry.
Media Contact:
And hasn't trouble followed him since he was an aprentice?
It seems to me that he places himself above the law or he would have learnt 10 years ago.
But maybe this is one time to many..or maybe that was even a while ago !!!!! real shame, but he is a reflection of the society we all live in..
MEDIA RELEASE
Thoroughbred – Jockey Clint Harvey
The RWWA Stewards inquiry into the report received from the ChemCentre (Perth) in regard to the presence of a banned substance in the urine sample taken from Jockey Clint Harvey at the Lark Hill Barrier Trials on Monday, 5 November 2012, was adjourned on 29 November 2012 to enable Mr Harvey to consider the evidence heard and consult with his legal advisors who had forwarded a written submission to the inquiry.
The inquiry was to resume today, however was adjourned prior to the scheduled start time following the lodgement of a Notice of Appeal to the Racing Penalties Appeal Tribunal (RPAT), today seeking leave to appeal against the determination of the Stewards to not require that the remaining portion of the sample held by the laboratories be subjected to further independent testing in relation to the identity of that sample, whether by gender testing, DNA testing or otherwise as requested by Mr Harvey through his counsel.
Accordingly the Stewards have determined that the matter will remain adjourned until the resolution of the application before the RPAT, with a date for the matter to be considered by that body to be determined in due course.
Jockey Harvey remains stood down pursuant to AR81A(3) from riding trackwork, trials and races.
Media Contact:
Was a licensed piss taker for many years and you would be surprised over those years how many men were pregnant!!!! only1 actually, but samples do get mixed up at times.
From my experience It is a tactic used to try to discredit the chain of custody..
The only way it wouldn't have been his is if it had shown the source of the urine to be pregnant.