G'day Punter!

In this Discussion

Who's Online

0 Members & 32 Non Members

Racing Victoria steps in as horse sale industry comes under attack

West Australian Racing
TheDivaTheDiva    13,248 posts
edited December 2013 West Australian Racing
AS leading auction houses yesterday defended the horse sale industry amid accusations of rorts, Racing Victoria announced it would investigate whether the industry was in need of reform.

While insisting Inglis and Magic Millions acted with integrity, the Australian Racing Board has revealed it and other industry bodies had received numerous complaints about alleged dummy bidding and "rogue'' bloodstock agents.

Inglis chief executive Mark Webster insisted talk of widespread dummy bidding was "speculation'' and said his company was unaware of pre-sale deals and condemned such activity.

ARB chief executive Peter McGauran said breeders had fought hard against a new ARB rule that outlawed the use of anabolic steroids on all horses, from yearlings to racehorses.

McGauran said a "new era'' of transparency and integrity had put aspects of thoroughbred breeding and auctions on notice.

Leading breeder and Racing Victoria board member David Moodie said on Sunday occasional dodgy practices were a blight on the industry, mainly at yearling sales. He insisted most acted properly.

Moodie said pre-sale deals and dummy bidders were not widespread but were common enough to affect overall confidence.

Moodie also criticised sales companies for offering buyers extended periods of credit. Inglis was left with more than $5 million in debt after the collapse of BC3.

Racing Victoria chief executive Bernard Saundry said RVL would contact the Australian Securities and Investments Commission regarding codes of conduct in the horse sale industry.

"We don't know what the answers are, but we are keen to look into it over the next few months, to see if customers were properly protected and, if not, what can be done,'' Saundry said.

The heads of Australia's two major sales companies, Inglis and Magic Millions, said rorts were not widespread.

Vin Cox, head of Magic Millions, said market forces usually ensured the integrity of any sale.

Cox and Webster said providing extended periods of credit to buyers was crucial to the buying and subsequent syndication of horses.

"If we stopped giving credit, the whole system grinds to a halt,'' Webster said.

"We'd love for everyone to pay on the day, but it just doesn't work that way. Trainers will buy a horse like that and go back to their clients and syndicate it out.

"If anyone can come up with a better system, please let me know. There isn't one.''

Webster said beleaguered BC3 had been given strict 30-days terms to settle the $5 million account for Black Caviar's half brother, "Jimmy".

"But they couldn't meet their obligation, simple as that,'' Webster said.

Webster conceded "there could be a need for reform in some areas'' but said 99.9 per cent of buyers and sellers "meet their obligations''.

Webster said Inglis provided free and accurate advice to consumers about the "true'' value of horses to be sold at auction.

Henty Plumptre, head of Darley's Australian operation, said rorts were "absolutely rife'' at horse sales in Britain and the US in the 1970s and 1980s but modern sales could be trusted.

story Herald Sun.

Comments

  • darkshinesdarkshines    2,837 posts

    LoL. Integrity.

     

    'Passed in at $79,500 on reserve of $80,000'

    TheFunkster, PieMan likes this post.

  • LuckyLongshotsLuckyLongshots    4,270 posts
    Yeah we'll see how far this goes!
  • PuntingTragicPuntingTragic    1,141 posts
    Shonks in race horse sales no way don't believe it yeah right there aren't plenty of them over the years

    Fortunately some very good people involved as well
  • LeglessLegless    5,108 posts
    edited December 2013
    :O  a sale without dummy bids =))

    Faarrqq we have side bets - to see how far they are trying to push it up (:|

    RIO, TheFunkster, PieMan likes this post.

  • wedgewedge    269 posts
    geez this is pretty scary stuff - remember that the ownership of the bloodstock is regulated by asic…..

    i guess you don't go around asking $45 for bhp when it sells for $35 on market - ASIC would be forced to interfere yeah?

    here is a thought - blind auction

    put your best bid in a locked box with associated lot number. 

    stallion service fees would have a quick adjustment….

    thefalcon likes this post.

  • SPUDLEYSPUDLEY    1,584 posts
    Yearling sales have been dodgy from day dot.
  • PieManPieMan    271 posts
    I won't buy another horse from an auction. Inwonder what the ramifications would be if all horses that entered the auction didn't have a reserve price. You would need a very close friend to put a dummy bid in, as they could be kept with the purchase.
  • RIORIO    14,902 posts
    electronic bidding so you can trace ever bid made...pretty simple, but no way any auction house would ever do that..
  • LeglessLegless    5,108 posts
    reserve prices should be made known - would stop all the shenanigans  [-(

    Thoroly_Bread likes this post.

  • SPUDLEYSPUDLEY    1,584 posts
    In a perfect world knowing the reserve would be good but when people get told 2 or 3 different reserves and vendors do have the right to change their minds when the horse is in the ring as the heat of battle between buyers heats up but if the reserve was set in stone but then I better pinch myself as I must be dreaming.
  • VoodooVoodoo    1,369 posts
    Maybe a condition of sale could be..... all horses put through the sale ring are to be sold outright. Bidding will start at the vendors reserve price......or maybe not .....

    cheers

    PieMan likes this post.

  • LeglessLegless    5,108 posts
    edited December 2013
    Just a few from last years Perth yearling sale - make your own conclusions

    Psd $14,000 Res $15,000
    Psd $145,000 Res $150,000
    Psd $14,000 Res $15,000
    Psd $21,000 Res $22,000
    Psd $195,000 Res $200,000
  • thefalconthefalcon    20,482 posts

    bloody hell, certainly makes you wonder what is going on...

    it would cost them the difference just to keep them for another sale day.

    i smell a dirty big rat....

    :-w

    Darkhorse likes this post.

  • SPUDLEYSPUDLEY    1,584 posts
    Can we have lot numbers for those 5 as you will find a lot just get put through as part of MM race clause .
  • DamienWyerDamienWyer    7,985 posts
    Legless said:

    Just a few from last years Perth yearling sale - make your own conclusions

    Psd $14,000 Res $15,000
    Psd $145,000 Res $150,000
    Psd $14,000 Res $15,000
    Psd $21,000 Res $22,000
    Psd $195,000 Res $200,000

    If you supply lot numbers, I may still have my notes from those yearlings from last year. Sometimes I just write a straight no and move on as it is a waste of time if I am not interested. But for quite a few yearlings I made notes even though I didn't bid at all on them.
  • DaleDale    1,346 posts
    you need to make quick but complete notes damien. That was the first rule i had drummed into me. What happens when the full brother walks into the ring the next year and all you have is NO scribbled beside it. Why did you not like it, long pasterns, turned in, hocks, eyes pointing in wrong direction? how can you compare when you dont have the notes. And when one of these horses comes out and is a crock, you can say yes that's right it had a certain leg issue. Or if it turns into a champ maybe next years has a similar attribute.

    i have sale books going back to 2001 with my notes taking up the whole page but written/scrawled in 10 seconds. now with digital sales catalogs this should be even easier to store. maybe ask someone that buys horses to have a sneaky look at their book and the guys who are pedigree buffs will have a full page. The boys with all the money can say yes or no but i am sure the real Bloodstock agents keep their notes for future reference.




  • DamienWyerDamienWyer    7,985 posts
    Lot 153 passed in for $195,000 res $200,000 looked at it and didn't like it, thought it lacked substance. Out of a 4 start prov maiden. This filly was very well bred but I think the expectations of the vendor were unrealistic for what it was.Fantastic breeding scores through her sireline over Danehill. I didn't have the x-rays checked as I wasn't intending to bid. Has been named Miss Kitwe.

    Lot 47 passed in for $145,000 res $150,000 I thought it was lacking scope and slightly narrow chested. Again extremely well bred yearling and seeing how both examples that were quoted have come from the same vendor, at least in my opinion they are getting some very good breeding advice. I again didn't have the x-rays checked as I didn't intend to bid on this horse. Has been named Fat Mouse.

    As far as the other yearlings quoted, I don't think they were asking a lot, as all were under $25,000 and most of them would have cost most of that just to get them to the sales ring.

    If either of the first two yearlings developed into nice types that wouldn't be overly surprising, as their respective breeding's should bring results if the horses were sound.


  • DamienWyerDamienWyer    7,985 posts
    Dale said:

    you need to make quick but complete notes damien. That was the first rule i had drummed into me. What happens when the full brother walks into the ring the next year and all you have is NO scribbled beside it. Why did you not like it, long pasterns, turned in, hocks, eyes pointing in wrong direction? how can you compare when you dont have the notes. And when one of these horses comes out and is a crock, you can say yes that's right it had a certain leg issue. Or if it turns into a champ maybe next years has a similar attribute.


    i have sale books going back to 2001 with my notes taking up the whole page but written/scrawled in 10 seconds. now with digital sales catalogs this should be even easier to store. maybe ask someone that buys horses to have a sneaky look at their book and the guys who are pedigree buffs will have a full page. The boys with all the money can say yes or no but i am sure the real Bloodstock agents keep their notes for future reference.




    'real bloodstock agents' ?

    Well this one uses two computers, I gave up on paper sometime ago. All I needed was a reference, but I did some guess work and have gone with the above 'notes'.
  • LeglessLegless    5,108 posts
    edited December 2013
    randomly selected a few

    Psd $14,000 Res $15,000  - Lot 289
    Psd $145,000 Res $150,000 - Lot 47
    Psd $14,000 Res $15,000 - Lot 408
    Psd $21,000 Res $22,000 - Lot 366
    Psd $195,000 Res $200,000 - Lot 153

    There are others  - i.e

    Psd $24,000 Res $25,000-Lot 271
    Psd $59,000 Res $60,000-Lot 335
    Psd $48,000 Res $50,000-Lot 35

    These are only where the last bid is one short of the reserve - there are heaps more that are very close

    To me it it begs the question -

    How many are sold at one bid over the reserve? :-?
  • RIORIO    14,902 posts
    nothing to see here...everyone move along.....
  • LeglessLegless    5,108 posts
    edited December 2013


    RIO said:

    nothing to see here...everyone move along.....

    "Racing Victoria announced it would investigate whether the industry was in need of reform."

    "While insisting Inglis and Magic Millions acted with integrity, the
    Australian Racing Board has revealed it and other industry bodies had
    received numerous complaints about alleged dummy bidding"

    Lets just see the % that are sold at the reserve or just one bid over the reserve  :-w

    RIO likes this post.

  • IntoItIntoIt    659 posts
    Can just imagine the sigh of relief from the vendor and auctioneer when a "real" buyer takes the hook. Cant get the hammer down quick enough!

    RIO, paraletic likes this post.

  • RIORIO    14,902 posts
    your screwed no matter what, as the dummy bidding then raises the price if you try to buy the stock afterwards... its a rort and everyone who has been around for a year or two knows it.. between what you highlight and the buy back options we are talking about a big percentage of all horses presented at Perth MM hey @davidh ???
  • RIORIO    14,902 posts
    oh and both buy back and bidding on your own stock is fully legal. no suggestion of anything untoward on my behalf
  • IntoItIntoIt    659 posts
    The smaller, newer, less known vendors usually reflect truer value. MM cant get them out of the ring quick enough! After a while you can read  an auction like a book. Ego tripping, especially the high lots.
  • darkshinesdarkshines    2,837 posts
    edited December 2013
    Buying a yearling at auction is for those who can afford to be ripped off at every turn. Even if you nab something that can run, youve almost certainly paid overs
  • LarkhillLarrikinLarkhillLarrikin    67 posts
    edited December 2013
    In regards to those passed in lots getting close to their reserve. It should be understood that some studs only enter yearlings to get them Magic Millions qualified. Therefore those studs that race horses,have them there to get them qualified for the MM race series. They set high reserves and will only sell if they get big overs. Once they have been through a MM sale they qualify for the race series sold or otherwise.
    Have a look at the passed in lots in the sales archive on MM website. It's there for all to see.

    RIO, Legless, Darkhorse likes this post.

  • DamienWyerDamienWyer    7,985 posts
    I think it is unfair to name a Stud for having this business practice, when it is at best a supposition on your part.

    During the bidding for what would become Petrol Power, it started with about 12 genuine bidders, there was no need for dummy bids. My understanding was that the reserve was passed within the first 60 seconds and it took for the price to hit $200,000 before it was just me against who would turn out to be the under bidder. Whether they set their reserves too high is a commercial decision for them to make, but from what I know of studs that produce a reasonable amount of yearlings, they cannot retain and race them all.

    What has been the experience in other localities around the World, is that Studs get known for keeping the good ones and selling the rest. This can be just perception, but those Studs that sell 100% of their offered stock and sometimes meet the market in pricing, get equally known for this practice, and when buyers or agents talk to them, it is done with a certain confidence that what you are being told is in fact the truth.

    I have also found that the most genuine vendors I have have spoken to following my purchase of one of their yearlings, were only to happy to quietly tell me where they needed to be on price, and if it meet my expectations I told them as much.

  • Why do you have to turn every thread into ' it's all about me ' . Me me me, I I I . With regard to Petrol Power. JimmyTaylor pick it, JT recommended it, You asked if you could bid on his behalf. For christ sake stop turning every thread into a Damien Wyer promo !!

    Darkhorse likes this post.

  • DamienWyerDamienWyer    7,985 posts

    Why do you have to turn every thread into ' it's all about me ' . Me me me, I I I . With regard to Petrol Power. JimmyTaylor pick it, JT recommended it, You asked if you could bid on his behalf. For christ sake stop turning every thread into a Damien Wyer promo !!

    Perhaps if you understood my involvement has been erased in quite a few, then you would understand the need for me to self promote.


Sign In or Register to comment.