G'day Punter!

In this Discussion

Who's Online

0 Members & 68 Non Members

Perth Racing announce Belmont grandstand to be demolished

West Australian Racing

Comments

  • DamienWyerDamienWyer    8,014 posts
    How long has it been since I was allowed inside Ascot with my camera ? I will go with 'D'
  • LeglessLegless    5,108 posts
    I'll go whenever Perth Racing was born - sign has probably been there since day one :-?
  • FastmoneyFastmoney    4,912 posts
    Theo, the perception is that PR are incompetent, ignorant fools.

    The 2 topics you are responding to, are insignificant examples but they are issues that don`t help the perception of PR.

    PR`s history creates the negative responses.

    While your intentions may be positive, you need to be aware that any decisions or lack of decisions will be judged and scrutinized against PR`s history of incompetence.

    Amyquil likes this post.

  • TheodorTheodor    199 posts
    Really Fastmoney. I would like to see how you would go negotiating the Belmont redevelopment. I was not there when it was largely done. I can tell you that it was not achieved by incompetent or ignorant individuals, quite the contrary. But no point in debating this with you. Here I go, I will state something that will give you all a buzz, "most of the comments I read on this forum are based on ignorance"

    thefalcon, Amyquil dislikes this post.

  • SLIPPERGOLDENSLIPPERGOLDEN    8,499 posts
    edited January 2014
    Theodor said:

    Just a little fun test. How long has the sign been in existence.?

    A: less than 3 months
    B: 3 months to 12 months
    C: 1 year to 2 years
    D. 2 years to 4 years
    E. 4 years to 8 years
    F. More than 8 years

    If you haven't been to Ascot or never watched a race at the course then you can't play albeit I reckon you will have just as much chance of answering the quiz.

    I'll pay that Theodore but if people including designers and installers didn't notice the sign error and if this is an indication of the attention paid to signs in general then those advertisers paying the bucks for signs at the track have reason for concern. :-?

    RIO likes this post.

  • LeglessLegless    5,108 posts
    edited January 2014

    EXACTLY !!!
    Theodor said:

     Here I go, I will state something that will give you all a buzz, "most of the comments I read on this forum are based on ignorance"

    ignorance
    ˈɪgn(ə)r(ə)ns/
    noun
    noun: ignorance
    1.
    lack of knowledge or information.

    Ignorance is distinguished from stupidity, ignorance is a state of being uninformed (lack of knowledge).

    Dale, TheFunkster, Amyquil, Rodent likes this post.

  • DamienWyerDamienWyer    8,014 posts
    Theodor said:

    Really Fastmoney. I would like to see how you would go negotiating the Belmont redevelopment. I was not there when it was largely done. I can tell you that it was not achieved by incompetent or ignorant individuals, quite the contrary. But no point in debating this with you. Here I go, I will state something that will give you all a buzz, "most of the comments I read on this forum are based on ignorance"

    Eddie, I think you unfairly tar the contributors with the same brush. Perhaps you could be more specific in your claim.



     
  • FastmoneyFastmoney    4,912 posts
    Theodor said:

    Really Fastmoney. I would like to see how you would go negotiating the Belmont redevelopment. I was not there when it was largely done. I can tell you that it was not achieved by incompetent or ignorant individuals, quite the contrary. But no point in debating this with you. Here I go, I will state something that will give you all a buzz, "most of the comments I read on this forum are based on ignorance"

    Did you miss the word perception Theo?
  • paraleticparaletic    3,750 posts
    edited January 2014
    Theo sign was up for approx 3 years..... And no patrons saw it or noticed it until now. #spellingbeeworldchampionships #ascot2014 #membersfloor
  • AndrewCarterAndrewCarter    2,171 posts
    Theodor tell me this what do you think of Van Heemst's decision to continue defending the indefensible after Robertson left and was no longer the CEO.

    I would really love to hear a rational explanation from someone in authority in regard to that bizarre decision, a decision that cost the club and RWWA and the West many tens of thousands if not more in legal fees unnecessarily, rather than move to settle and apologize for destroying my personal and professional reputation and my professional career not to mention costing me a lucrative international employment opportunity.

    Please justify that stroke of genius when the club was eventually forced to settle anyway and admit the truth.

    Myself and my family wasted nearly five years of our lives fighting to clear my name because of the actions of so called industry leaders such as Van Heemst, Robertson, and O'Reilly, a fight that was forced upon us for no bloody reason whatsoever.

    Then explain how the club and or RWWA can possibly justify allowing people such as Van Heemst and O'Reilly to remain in positions of power.

    In addition to that please explain why the club again threatened me legally and pressured 6pr when I was going to be speaking to Howard Sattler soon after the settlement about evidence I had gathered prior to and events that occurred prior to my defamation action of which I had ironclad proof and also events that were not within the jurisdiction of any non disclosure agreement that I was forced to sign.

    Due you also consider that an appropriate use of club resources?

    Until someone there has the integrity and intestinal fortitude to face up to me and my family and take some action in regard to this and against the individuals involved, every poor decision and mistake that is made by the club will continue to be highlighted.

    You have lost probably forever a regular racegoer who loved going to the races and mixing with my many friends and contacts within the industry both on racedays and at trials etc, now you can't drag me out there unless I absolutely have to attend for some reason.

    Previously I also used to write passionately in a number of different local and national publications about the industry and was a staunch supporter of hard working industry people.

    I also used to regularly turnover substantial amounts each week through both the on course tote and on course bookmakers and often used to bring my family and close friends to the races, none of whom now attend any meetings as a direct result of what occurred.

    So next time you think people are not giving the Turf Club a fair go and shouldn't be so critical of the club and its efforts, think about my case and the litany of costly errors that have been made by the club over the years and you might begin to fathom why there is a considerable amount of healthy scepticism towards the actions of the Turf Club and that of its so called leader Van Heemst.

  • MandyMandy    4 posts
    Another day, another Andrew rant - boring, boring, boring.

    The 20 January rant stated "professional reputation as a journalist", can't say I have seen or heard any of your work Andrew, I do hope that your contributions to journalism are more varied than your posts here!

    Theodor likes this post.

    carey, Amyquil dislikes this post.

  • careycarey    6,424 posts
    i think he has earned the right personally, to vent as he wishes.
    and he does annoy me some times with what he writes, but not on that subject
    you need to walk a mile in his shoes.

    so if you were the victim mandy, you would just grin and bare, i take it.
    and say thank you very much to those wonderful people!!



    Fastmoney, RIO, loco, Amyquil likes this post.

  • DamienWyerDamienWyer    8,014 posts
    Mandy said:

    Another day, another Andrew rant - boring, boring, boring.

    The 20 January rant stated "professional reputation as a journalist", can't say I have seen or heard any of your work Andrew, I do hope that your contributions to journalism are more varied than your posts here!

    Andrew more than likely, would have had a career in some capacity in Racing had it not been for this action taken by Perth Racing. I can't think of too many people who would go quietly had this happened to them.

    I would like to see him move on, but I completely understand his need to vent when you listen to the dribble that comes out of some troll on here.

    Thoroly_Bread likes this post.

  • DarkhorseDarkhorse    666 posts
    Do you think incorporating a five star venue with a view of the river and the city, would be a good idea, It could then be leased out to a top class chef to use on a full time basis, such as Rockpool.
    This would attract the top end of the town on a daily basis and provide a constant income stream.
    I am not talking of a mum and dad operation but a full 5 star, with world class offerings, wine , food and chef.
    After all we need a good restaurant there and the Turf  Club are not in the catering business at that level.

    Carlosa likes this post.

  • thefalconthefalcon    20,505 posts

    good idea, darkhorse but there are about 5 5* restaurants across the road.take your pick, chinese, french, italian and a steakhouse and japanese.

    it would be a huge, expensive gamble.

    as a matter of interest a mate was guest at the swanky chinese last tuesday night and he and his wife took the opportunity to have a peek at the other top class eateries. they were astounded to find them extremely well patronised..bearing in mind it was a tuesday night.

    there is plenty of spare cash in perth!!

  • RadmanRadman    1,992 posts

    Theodor tell me this what do you think of Van Heemst's decision to continue defending the indefensible after Robertson left and was no longer the CEO.

    I would really love to hear a rational explanation from someone in authority in regard to that bizarre decision, a decision that cost the club and RWWA and the West many tens of thousands if not more in legal fees unnecessarily, rather than move to settle and apologize for destroying my personal and professional reputation and my professional career not to mention costing me a lucrative international employment opportunity.

    Please justify that stroke of genius when the club was eventually forced to settle anyway and admit the truth.

    Myself and my family wasted nearly five years of our lives fighting to clear my name because of the actions of so called industry leaders such as Van Heemst, Robertson, and O'Reilly, a fight that was forced upon us for no bloody reason whatsoever.

    Then explain how the club and or RWWA can possibly justify allowing people such as Van Heemst and O'Reilly to remain in positions of power.

    In addition to that please explain why the club again threatened me legally and pressured 6pr when I was going to be speaking to Howard Sattler soon after the settlement about evidence I had gathered prior to and events that occurred prior to my defamation action of which I had ironclad proof and also events that were not within the jurisdiction of any non disclosure agreement that I was forced to sign.

    Due you also consider that an appropriate use of club resources?

    Until someone there has the integrity and intestinal fortitude to face up to me and my family and take some action in regard to this and against the individuals involved, every poor decision and mistake that is made by the club will continue to be highlighted.

    You have lost probably forever a regular racegoer who loved going to the races and mixing with my many friends and contacts within the industry both on racedays and at trials etc, now you can't drag me out there unless I absolutely have to attend for some reason.

    Previously I also used to write passionately in a number of different local and national publications about the industry and was a staunch supporter of hard working industry people.

    I also used to regularly turnover substantial amounts each week through both the on course tote and on course bookmakers and often used to bring my family and close friends to the races, none of whom now attend any meetings as a direct result of what occurred.

    So next time you think people are not giving the Turf Club a fair go and shouldn't be so critical of the club and its efforts, think about my case and the litany of costly errors that have been made by the club over the years and you might begin to fathom why there is a considerable amount of healthy scepticism towards the actions of the Turf Club and that of its so called leader Van Heemst.



    There are only two people that haven't heard this story, Elvis & Patrick Starfish. Elvis because he's dead, and Patrick Starfish because he sleeps under a rock.
  • DarkhorseDarkhorse    666 posts
    I didn't know Patrick Starfish slept under a rock.
  • RadmanRadman    1,992 posts
    Darkhorse said:

    I didn't know Patrick Starfish slept under a rock.




    And you call yourself a Spongebob Squarepants Fan?? You're obviously not quite as mature and refined as you think you are Darkhorse....
  • DarkhorseDarkhorse    666 posts
    I feel sorry for the little fella, maybe we can include an aquarium into the new grandstand design
  • LeglessLegless    5,108 posts
    edited January 2014
    right next to the Krusty Krab - so we can check him out whilst queuing for our krabby patties :D
  • TheodorTheodor    199 posts
    Answer is C (between 2 and 4 years). Pretty amazing no one picked it up in nearly 3 years.

    Andrew, I never read your rants so don't waste them targeting me. I do hope you can move on.

    Amyquil, SPUDLEY, Fastmoney, Dale, Rodent dislikes this post.

  • RIORIO    14,902 posts
    Going to get that stallion out of retirement after the last @Theodor ???

    You bored and waiting in the taxi queue
  • TheodorTheodor    199 posts
    Not sure where he is but having some handy winners recently eg Silver Trace (best 2 yr old this season IMO), Dueton and Busters Empire.

    RIO likes this post.

  • DamienWyerDamienWyer    8,014 posts
    Theodor said:

    Answer is C (between 2 and 4 years). Pretty amazing no one picked it up in nearly 3 years.

    Andrew, I never read your rants so don't waste them targeting me. I do hope you can move on.

    How can you say that as a member of the Perth Racing Committee ? I don't care if Andrew rants, I have said many times I hope he can move on, but this attitude of yours is contemptible.

    Do you have any idea what your colleagues attempted to do ?

     
  • SPUDLEYSPUDLEY    1,584 posts
    Oh Theodor you really do live in different world to all of us just imagine if you got knocked off your ivory tower all by a pack of lies which the organisation you are a committeeman of did to Andrew then I think you may have a different view on how he feels.
  • AmyquilAmyquil    250 posts
    edited January 2014
    Theodor said:

    ........Andrew, I never read your rants so don't waste them targeting me. I do hope you can move on.


    Abuse of power, lack of press accountability etc etc etc. A disgusting episode. That is, if you're someone who believes there should be no place for this disgusting behaviour.

    Mind you, this is all part of a corporate culture that values loyalty above all else and at any price. Potential whistleblowers need not apply.

    I have said many things on here critical of Andrew. He certainly hasn't endeared himself to me. Or anyone, likely but nothing forgives this tawdry and bizarre episode.

    As for Theo, his contempt and lack of empathy says a lot about the sort of person he is. No doubt he has his eyes on the top job. Sociopaths usually go far.




    Carlosa, Dale likes this post.

  • IntoItIntoIt    659 posts
    Oughta stick Damien and Theodor in a room with boxing  gloves, or pistols at dawn!? Maybe introduce Andrew to your Facebook page Damien to be amongst a more caring audience.Most here are aware of his plight and are sympathetic but perhaps we need to move on.

    Theodor likes this post.

  • AndrewCarterAndrewCarter    2,171 posts
    edited January 2014
    So Theodor you obviously tacitly or otherwise condone the actions of Van Heemst, Robertson and O'Reilly in that case, that tell me two things, it speaks volumes for your character and ethics and makes you perfect for the committee.
    Secondly it means you openly condone corruption and the abuse of power because their actions were the very definition of those two outstanding qualities that clearly are a prerequisite to become a WA thoroughbred industry leader.
  • TheodorTheodor    199 posts
    edited January 2014
    Well before my time Andrew. My point is that I would rather you not rant on this site to me about something that happened well before I was involved in any capacity at PR other than as a member. I don't know the facts or even what it was all about. As I said, I hope you can move on as it seems to be wrecking your life. I don't wish to engage on this as I have no idea how it can change anything. For the record there are only 3 committee members that have been on the committee for more than 4 years.
  • youknowityouknowit    271 posts
    andrew carter. I am also regular racegoer and i do not recall you turning over substantial amounts of money with tote or bookys when you  attended the races. dont actually recall you betting at all.Also regarding the lucrative international media opportunity. As the charges against you were not proven and with your talents in journalism over 20 years i am very surprised you have not received other offers.

    Fastmoney, carey dislikes this post.

This discussion has been closed.