G'day Punter!

In this Discussion

Who's Online

0 Members & 112 Non Members

RWWA's strategic plan for racing in WA

West Australian Racing

Comments

  • JellJell    1,202 posts
    The hypocrisy of RWWA still amazes me. Crying that the corporates are driving down turnover, yet continuing to let one of them (William Hill) manage your fixed odds.
  • FastmoneyFastmoney    4,912 posts

    RWWA Records 4.5% Lift in Annual Profit before Industry Funding



    Industry





    17_annual_report













    Racing and Wagering Western Australia (RWWA) has today
    announced its financial results for the year ending 31 July 2017,
    highlighting a 4.5% increase in overall profit before industry funding.

    “RWWA achieved a positive financial outcome with overall profit
    before industry funding increasing by 4.5% from $140.8M in 2015/16 to
    $147.1M in 2016/17,” said RWWA CEO Richard Burt.

    In 2016/17 a record allocation of $152M was distributed to the
    Western Australian racing and sporting industries, an additional $3M
    from the previous year.

    Since RWWA’s inception in 2003, annual funding to the industry has
    increased from $63M to $152M; a 141% increase over a 14 year period.

    A further $29M of funding was dedicated to racing administration and
    integrity services, leading to an overall funding commitment of $181M
    for the year.

    “The racing industry is an important contributor to employment,
    participation and economic development within Western Australia. The
    industry generates more than $821M in economic contribution to the State
    and has over 24,000 people participating in the sport,” said RWWA CEO
    Richard Burt.

    “Racing enjoys mass participation across the state with 823,000
    people attending race meetings annually and has a heritage that needs to
    be acknowledged and supported for future generations.”

    Whilst lowering betting values resulted in a decline in wagering
    revenue from the TAB of 4.14%, the strong margin across the year from
    pari-mutuel and fixed odds of 17.1%, assisted to offset the turnover
    result. Furthermore, income from interstate wagering operators betting
    on Western Australian racing increased by 11%, a total of $5.3M for the
    year.

    As part of the record funding level, $5.8M was provided towards RWWA
    funded infrastructure grants to race clubs for maintenance and renewal
    of racing and public facilities.

    In addition to RWWA funded grants, the Western Australian Government
    contributed $1.9M during the year, through the Royalties for Regions
    program toward racing infrastructure grants. It is expected the
    remaining Government funded grants of $2M will be committed and expensed
    in 2017/18.

    During the year, RWWA commenced development of new strategic plans
    for each of the three racing codes. These plans are important in
    communicating and gaining stakeholder support for each code in order to
    achieve positive long term commercial sustainability. Full
    implementation of the code plans will occur following consultation with
    industry in early 2017/18.

    For the first time RWWA has provided a breakdown of statistics
    regarding greyhound euthanasia and rehoming numbers in its annual
    report.

    The statistics highlight a decrease in euthanasia relating to
    greyhounds not being suitable for rehoming of 93% from the previous
    year. The dramatic decrease is due to a number of strategies being
    implemented by RWWA’s integrity department, including mandatory
    behavioural assessments for retired greyhounds, increased investment in
    RWWA’s rehoming initiative (Greyhounds as Pets (GAP)), enhanced data
    capture and tracking, and stricter breeding controls.

    The statistics also highlight a 102% increase in adoptions through
    GAP, with a total of 245 greyhound being rehomed by the program in
    2016/17.

    “RWWA is committed to ensuring that the best levels of care are given
    to greyhounds throughout all stages of their lives, through a program
    of investment, education, monitoring and regulation. When a greyhound
    retires from the racing industry, at any age, RWWA aims to achieve every
    healthy and behaviourally sound greyhound being rehomed,” said RWWA CEO
    Richard Burt.

  • FastmoneyFastmoney    4,912 posts
    edited October 2017
    TheDiva said:

    image



    As a comparison Tab-corp CEO annual salary $3.19m, Racing Victoria CEO annual salary $1.5m.

    RIO likes this post.

  • FastmoneyFastmoney    4,912 posts
    Another comparison is the NZ Racing Board CEO (similar set up to RWWA) annual salary $1m+.
  • JellJell    1,202 posts
    I purely speak from a punters P.O.V

    I have no problem with CEO's being paid well providing the product they put forward is up to scratch.

    The TAB runs a decent betting website in my opinion. I can't speak for the retail outlets because I don't live over East. Never had any problems betting with them and they frame their own markets, I do understand they're much larger though.

    I have a problem with CEO's getting paid well and pay rises when their product is inferior and quite frankly a steaming pile of...

    There are so many issues with the WA TAB. I send constant Tweets, SMS's and Emails regarding these issues, to try and get some clarity but never receive any answers.
  • FastmoneyFastmoney    4,912 posts
    Fairly certain the following statement adds some justification to the salary.

    "Since RWWA’s inception in 2003, annual funding to the industry has
    increased from $63M to $152M; a 141% increase over a 14 year period."

  • RIORIO    14,902 posts
    Fastmoney said:

    Fairly certain the following statement adds some justification to the salary.

    "Since RWWA’s inception in 2003, annual funding to the industry has
    increased from $63M to $152M; a 141% increase over a 14 year period."

    Real estate prices have increased from $210k to $515 in the same time....About 145%, Could've bought a few house and been better off!!!! hahaha Only joking. I luv how you can shape any opinion you want to with numbers.

    To work in a Government enterprise and be paid more than all your contemporaries in those enterprises, means you are at the top of the tree.....And this bloke is no longer performing at that level. After 3 years of trying to get a solution for the industry he still cant make it happen. He has failed and should be moved on. The salary isn't an issue for me. If he was getting paid 2mil or 200k, it will always be reflective of what the market price is to get someone to do that job.

    Comparing him to other racing jurisdictions - even NZ - is not relevant. He is a head of department in the state government, you compare his salary to other heads. That is who he is being measured against.
  • FastmoneyFastmoney    4,912 posts
    edited October 2017
    What about this one, multiple Council CEO`s get paid more than the Premier of WA.

    Pretty sure the NZ example is similar to the WA Government pay scale, NZ Racing Board CEO highest paid Government department head in NZ

  • RIORIO    14,902 posts
    Council CEO's aren't department heads.. In the government it is all measured via a Matrix based on job description, people and asset management. State/Local government are unable to be compared either...
    the thing with NZ is the only relevant comparison. Both department heads are he highest paid. One is a country or federal level, and the other is a state level. It's fun to compare them but not relative to value of remuneration in my opinion.

    As stated, If RWWA had an effect CEO i'd not complain if they were paid $2mil. Dickie B has had 3 years to sort this mess out and has not achieved it...We all know he's been pushing shite up hill to get agreement on anything...but that is his job. He's not achieved it. good bye, let someone else have a try!!
  • FastmoneyFastmoney    4,912 posts
    edited October 2017
    Council example was about comparing the outrage from The West article.

    Page 3 headline "Council CEO`s earn more than the WA Premier" would get the same response even though all the info is readily available.

    90% of the population get their opinions shaped by headlines and social media and most of those opinions aren`t based on facts but on snippets of information that sensationalize issues.

    The majority of racing's problems started 10 years prior to RWWA and were the very reason RWWA was formed.

    Not sure any individual is going to make any significant difference to the overall TAB and RWWA performance.

    PR execs and a few high profile Thoroughbred participants are pushing for more control and they have a strategy to fix Thoroughbreds by rationalizing Harness tracks and redistributing Harness distribution back to Thoroughbreds (despite the most recent report showing Thoroughbred pare mutuel turnover at 50% and their distribution at 63%).

    The problem in WA is that Government doesn`t value Racing (similar to QLD, SA & TAS) and with the current economic environment that won`t be changing.

    RIO likes this post.

  • TheDivaTheDiva    13,248 posts
    The majority of racing's problems started 10 years prior to RWWA and were the very reason RWWA was formed.

    and.... if thats why they were formed... what has been achieved? 
  • FastmoneyFastmoney    4,912 posts
    TheDiva said:

    The majority of racing's problems started 10 years prior to RWWA and were the very reason RWWA was formed.


    and.... if thats why they were formed... what has been achieved? 
    "Since RWWA’s inception in 2003, annual funding to the industry has
    increased from $63M to $152M; a 141% increase over a 14 year period."
  • FastmoneyFastmoney    4,912 posts
    WA Harness stakemoney prior to RWWA


    image
  • FastmoneyFastmoney    4,912 posts
    Since RWWA


    image
  • NevershowsurpriseNevershowsurprise    995 posts
    edited October 2017
    Fastmoney said:

    TheDiva said:

    The majority of racing's problems started 10 years prior to RWWA and were the very reason RWWA was formed.


    and.... if thats why they were formed... what has been achieved? 
    "Since RWWA’s inception in 2003, annual funding to the industry has
    increased from $63M to $152M; a 141% increase over a 14 year period."



    And?

    How have the codes benefited? In what ways are we better off as an industry than we were 10 years ago?

    RIO likes this post.

  • TheDivaTheDiva    13,248 posts
    Fastmoney said:

    TheDiva said:

    The majority of racing's problems started 10 years prior to RWWA and were the very reason RWWA was formed.


    and.... if thats why they were formed... what has been achieved? 
    "Since RWWA’s inception in 2003, annual funding to the industry has
    increased from $63M to $152M; a 141% increase over a 14 year period."
    sweet.... all problems solved then. 
  • FastmoneyFastmoney    4,912 posts
    TheDiva said:

    Fastmoney said:

    TheDiva said:

    The majority of racing's problems started 10 years prior to RWWA and were the very reason RWWA was formed.


    and.... if thats why they were formed... what has been achieved? 
    "Since RWWA’s inception in 2003, annual funding to the industry has
    increased from $63M to $152M; a 141% increase over a 14 year period."
    sweet.... all problems solved then. 
    Perhaps PR and those pushing for more control will do a better job.
  • RIORIO    14,902 posts
    edited October 2017
    So those figures show that RWWA has screwed harness into the ground. If RWWA increased turnover by 141% the funding this year should be about $31m for harness. Yet the intelligent people of PR and their astute cronies what to cut them lower??????

    Even in our darkest moment as an industry there are people fighting over the last breath from the dieing beast.....All the more reason why Burt has failed as a CEO and needs to be moved on. Anything that is going to be managed by an association that hasn't ran at a profit in the past decade, trying to take over the industry would be the catalyst for me to find a new hobby!!!! Gee imagine how good it would be for the studs and stakes money distribution. Us little fish would be destroyed
  • ThumperThumper    820 posts

    If he was to finish up tomorrow what would his legacy be? Nothing.

    The biggest issue the industry has is that the funding model which is about 50% reliant on the profits of the WA TAB. It's only a matter of time before it's sold and we'll be stuffed under the current funding model.

    If he wants to be remembered for something be the man to uncouple the TAB from RWWA and create a funding model that is not reliant on ownership of the WA TAB. Flogging a dead horse complaining about the amount of tax the TAB pays given it will sold and that income stream won't be there any way. 

  • ThumperThumper    820 posts
    Thumper said:

    Burt indicates cash reserves have grown $2M so given they lost $8M the previous financial year this is a huge result. $10M dollar turnaround.

    How does RWWA grow cash reserves by $2M given they lost $5M last financial year. A $3M improvement but still a $5M loss
  • ChariotsonfireChariotsonfire    3,025 posts
    Thumper said:

    Thumper said:

    Burt indicates cash reserves have grown $2M so given they lost $8M the previous financial year this is a huge result. $10M dollar turnaround.

    How does RWWA grow cash reserves by $2M given they lost $5M last financial year. A $3M improvement but still a $5M loss
    Probably due to that nebulous item on any financial report "Depreciation". Depreciation can effect your profit and loss without impacting cash reserves.
  • ChariotsonfireChariotsonfire    3,025 posts
    Financial Reports and Balance Sheets can be very deceiving although unintentionally.

    Take a look at the 2016 Balance Sheet for Gloucester Park (2017 not yet on the website) that shows Property valued at $5.2m. This would be closer to $80m plus on the current market.

    Buildings are shown as $7.3m when in reality they would be a liability if the property was sold.

    RIO likes this post.

  • ChariotsonfireChariotsonfire    3,025 posts
    RIO said:

    Fastmoney said:

    Fairly certain the following statement adds some justification to the salary.

    "Since RWWA’s inception in 2003, annual funding to the industry has
    increased from $63M to $152M; a 141% increase over a 14 year period."

    Real estate prices have increased from $210k to $515 in the same time....About 145%, Could've bought a few house and been better off!!!! hahaha Only joking. I luv how you can shape any opinion you want to with numbers.

    To work in a Government enterprise and be paid more than all your contemporaries in those enterprises, means you are at the top of the tree.....And this bloke is no longer performing at that level. After 3 years of trying to get a solution for the industry he still cant make it happen. He has failed and should be moved on. The salary isn't an issue for me. If he was getting paid 2mil or 200k, it will always be reflective of what the market price is to get someone to do that job.

    Comparing him to other racing jurisdictions - even NZ - is not relevant. He is a head of department in the state government, you compare his salary to other heads. That is who he is being measured against.
    Not getting involved in the salary debate but I am not sure where you get that real estate increase from. My residential property has not increased anywhere near that and the Reserve Bank inflation rate from 2004 to 2016 was 35%.
  • RIORIO    14,902 posts
    From REIWA for median house pricing in Perth over the period. So not a real suburb and not a real price....just the average over the year. Which can be reported in as many different was a financial record!!!! haha I bought one in 200 and sold it in 2004 and doubled our money... But that is just 1 house
  • FastmoneyFastmoney    4,912 posts
    RIO said:

    From REIWA for median house pricing in Perth over the period.

    And a touch misleading with almost a 100% increase between 2003 and 2007 as a direct result of the resource boom.

    Median house increase between 2007 and 2016 around 15%.

    RIO likes this post.

  • FastmoneyFastmoney    4,912 posts
    RWWA distribution increase from 2007 to 2017 around 59%.
  • RIORIO    14,902 posts
    Incredibly misleading...but i was just quoting the same time period as what was used to highlight RWWA's 141% increase in turnover
  • FastmoneyFastmoney    4,912 posts
    edited October 2017
    RIO said:

    Incredibly misleading...but i was just quoting the same time period as what was used to highlight RWWA's 141% increase in turnover

    Give RWWA some credit, their time period is the entirety of their existence, not a snapshot to inflate their performance.
  • RIORIO    14,902 posts
    I was highlighting that they were performing as expected over the period. No one should ever expect to be credited for anything they do that is as expected. If over that period they had grown the business by over 200% then some accolades could be expected. But they have done what would reasonable be expected of them. Kept growth at or above CPI, and made the industry secure and in step with other industries. Which wasn't being achieved when they took over.

    A good, but expected outcome. If they had the industry growing in leaps and bounds with private market injection of cash and Government help - like in NSW and Vic - then that would be something to really give them credit for. Not only keeping up with local market expectations but also with Industry growth expectations. They've achieved one, not the other.

    I'm glad they have stabilized our industry over their time. I hope they continue doing so. But that performance over 14 years is nothing special
  • FastmoneyFastmoney    4,912 posts
    edited October 2017
    Total Thoroughbred prizemoney increases from 03/04 to 15/16.

    NSW...VIC....QLD....WA....National
    71%....56%..63%..123%...65%

Sign In or Register to comment.