G'day Punter!

In this Discussion

Who's Online

0 Members & 169 Non Members

The Perth 2YO Season so far

West Australian Racing
DamienWyerDamienWyer    7,988 posts
edited January 2015 West Australian Racing
After yesterday's timely win by Essayez over 1100M, I thought I would have a look through the performances of the 2YO's since late November.

There have been four 1100M races and a further five 1000M races held.

In the later, only Chantski has broken one minute with a 58.83 and a final 600M of 34.24. the closest performance to him would be 6 lengths behind by Invincible Man, then Light Up The Sky a further 3 lengths behind again.

Over 1100M, Shady Grey sets the pace at 1.06.06 with a closing 600M of 36.91. Diamond Tonique was about two lengths behind this time but with a faster 600M the Essayez some seven lengths further behind with a slower closing 600M.

My point being that apart from Chantski's run, nothing else has impressed by comparison to the last couple of seasons. Unless the best is still to be seen, this is not an inspiring crop of 2YO's by the usual standards seen here in Perth.

So I wouldn't be betting with any confidence on exposed form to date is essentially what I am saying.

Comments

  • RIORIO    14,902 posts
    Gotta agree Damo. After yesterday i also went looking this morning and was wondering with such a uniformly slow group of 2 yr olds if it was the track that was slow....after a chat with intelligent people i was told to think what has changed since last year and the answer is the training surface.

    I've been told that the training surface doesn't encourage horses to dig in to the surface, they sort of glide across it, so maybe that is contributing to why the times are slower

    Darkhorse likes this post.

  • DaleDale    1,346 posts
    wind, heat, rail, dare i say it, barrier positioning or jockeys with hangovers. just a few factors that i can think of that would effect race times. Dont bag the horse man...............
  • Ridersonthestorm33Ridersonthestorm33    10,942 posts
    Time only matters if your in gaol Rio!

    RIO likes this post.

  • CarlosaCarlosa    1,287 posts
    Rebel Queen early Nov might be worth looking at...
  • Essayez what did it beat id say not alot putria jewel would beat it easy id say
  • LeglessLegless    5,108 posts
    edited January 2015
    They are babies and I wouldn't be expecting anything more from them. Most of these going around now probably wont be seen again after this prep unfortunately.

    Last year only 2 broke 1 minute for 1000m to this time of year - Roebuck, 59.62 on 26/10/13 and Hobart Jones 59:30 on 21/12/13.

    This year I can find only 2 - Lucky Street, 59.24 on 25/10/14 and Chantski, 58.83 on 10/01/15

    EDIT -  over the 1100

    13/14 - 1.05.50-  1.06.62-  1.06.92- 1.05.20

    14/15 - 01:06:21- 1:06:28-  1:07:92-  1:07:41

  • silkysilky    430 posts
    The times in most races were quite slow yesterday so i wouldn't read much into them. Essayez won well and did it all on ability. Give her time to mature and she will be a nice horse. When she strengthens up and Martin can get some decent work into her she will run time.
  • RIORIO    14,902 posts
    lets hope they come together over the next 8 weeks...both winning in slow times, so who knows...As Damo says, maybe the best 2yr olds haven't been seen yet.
  • careycarey    6,424 posts
    well your analysis is deeply flawed
    the time of a race is fully dependent on the horse setting the pace, and then times mean different things on different days, under different conditions.
    and nearly every race can be run faster than it actually is(especially in wa where crawling is the norm).

    anyway, a rough look at yesterday, shows me the 1st race winner ran only about 1.5 lengths slower than the horse you seem to think is the best so far.
    even that does not mean that much because it misses the essence of the runs.

    Carlosa, Downbythepalms, Jordan likes this post.

  • DamienWyerDamienWyer    7,988 posts
    carey said:

    well your analysis is deeply flawed
    the time of a race is fully dependent on the horse setting the pace, and then times mean different things on different days, under different conditions.
    and nearly every race can be run faster than it actually is(especially in wa where crawling is the norm).

    anyway, a rough look at yesterday, shows me the 1st race winner ran only about 1.5 lengths slower than the horse you seem to think is the best so far.
    even that does not mean that much because it misses the essence of the runs.

    Can't agree in the slightest. 2YO's run mostly on fright and flight. Getting them to settle is something that comes with experience but they have to have ability to begin with. If they can't break a minute over 1000M at Ascot they are not going to be a threat in black type races, not here or anywhere. Running 1.07.00 or more is almost 9 lens off the times required to win a slick run lead up race to a Karrakatta Plate.
  • careycarey    6,424 posts
    well you don't have to agree, it matters not.
    but you do breeding or whatever, and i do time.
    i wlll back me every day of the week in that scenario.
  • sintisinti    109 posts
    2yo run on fright :-))
    A badly educated 2yo might run on fear

    RIO, Bfacey77, thefalcon, rustyh, Jordan, Chelsea likes this post.

  • sintisinti    109 posts
    And your theory is flawed if they need to run a slick time to go into the karrakatta
    VITALISM must been the exception with a blistering 59.51 lead up run
  • sintisinti    109 posts
    And if cris is accurate i think if invincable man is 6 lengths from chanski
    That would make londener line closest 3 1/2 lenghts according to cris

    =))
  • I think Rio is spot on. Sinti your horse won well, you were in the zone last year with Vital Art. Just be patient this year & all you guys will reap the rewards. Good luck guys you have a big chance.

    sinti, carey, thefalcon, H-BOMBER likes this post.

  • SHOVHOGSHOVHOG    1,792 posts
    the locals will have company in the karrakatta plate this year. Waller will send at least 1.
  • LeglessLegless    5,108 posts
    edited January 2015
    I agree with Damian - if they don't break a minute over 1000m in the lead ups to the 2yr old Black Types IMHO they will not be a threat.
    Vitalism broke 1 minute in all of it's 1000m races
  • DamienWyerDamienWyer    7,988 posts
    Truck arrived on Friday with a 2YO filly formerly trained by Chris Waller, but doubtful it will be ready. Owner tells me it has a conformation issue apparently.
  • CarlosaCarlosa    1,287 posts
    What if you don't run over a 1,000??
  • DamienWyerDamienWyer    7,988 posts
    Vitalism, the $200 purchase............... one of those rare times when you go to a sale and say no I will pay for  it now. You take Visa ?

    thefalcon dislikes this post.

  • thefalconthefalcon    20,488 posts
    all of WA is shaking in their boots..... 8-X
  • SHOVHOGSHOVHOG    1,792 posts
    A d grader should be good enough
  • LeglessLegless    5,108 posts
    edited January 2015
    Carlosa said:

    What if you don't run over a 1,000??

    break 1.06 for 1100

    Carlosa likes this post.

  • careycarey    6,424 posts
    edited January 2015
    yes, but how can you say that, when every day is different.
    one minute one day will not necessarily mean one minute the next.
    the wind could be howling either way, they could have vertidrained, their mower could have gone on the blink!!
    it could have pissed down rain, somone could have left the sprinklers on far too long(that has happened if my memory is correct)
    not to mention that ascot the last few years has been infinitely slower than it once was, for reasons that i don't know.
    i don't need to know why, it only matters that i know it is true.

    that is for you legless.

    thefalcon, SPUDLEY likes this post.

  • sintisinti    109 posts
    If puteri jewel wins magic millions in 3 weeks were will that leave your theory lead up tun of 1.07.91
  • sintisinti    109 posts
    Run
  • LeglessLegless    5,108 posts
    edited January 2015
    must admit @carey I do not follow the 2 yr olds very closely at all. IMHO they should not be racing at this time of the year (that is a subject for a different thread)

    History tells the future - you would have all the times in front of you from years gone by - how many have won the Karrakatta that could not break 60secs over 1000m in the lead ups?

    EDIT: I believe the grass is being left a little longer and a bit more water is being applied to the track - might be why times are slowing up :-??
  • LeglessLegless    5,108 posts
    sinti said:

    If puteri jewel wins magic millions in 3 weeks were will that leave your theory lead up tun of 1.07.91

    I think the MM race has some sort of restricted (whatever that means) black type tag to it.
    Farq knows how it even has that status [-(
  • careycarey    6,424 posts
    i don't follow them ever legless, as i like all my form exposed if i want to bet.
    i am just of the opinion that times, while important in the big picture, are only really one small part of a big puzzle.
    i could probably check your question, but it's past my bed time nearly!!

    and the following especially is nonsensical.....
    "Running 1.07.00 or more is almost 9 lens off the times required to win a slick run lead up race to a Karrakatta Plate. "

    for starters how much time is 9 lengths???  in perth it would be about 1.44 seconds on any ground(.16 lps), but that is a construct and nothing to do with reality.

    pretty sure that the winner on any particular race only has to run fast enough to win the race.
    no more money for running time, and why would you run faster than you need to?
    as far as yesterday goes, i don't know yet what i think of it overall, i just know that the horse that led was left standing still, and that the winner put a few lengths on them in a hurry.
    what more should it have done?


  • paraleticparaletic    3,750 posts
    I think the good ones havent fronted up yet. Rebel Queen will give it a shake tho.

    Carlosa likes this post.

Sign In or Register to comment.